Women advise daughters to find a man to take care of them, while telling sons to avoid gold diggers... OBVIOUSLY there is A LOT of context missing in-between both statements, because to tell the son WHY is to now must explain the idea of value to the daughter... what do I mean? She'll tell the son that gold diggers only seek money, not to make him happy (be feminine, submissive, loyal, agreeable, supportive, etc...) However the irony is that these are not the things she would teach her daughter. She teaches her daughter her traits are "princess based" meaning her value comes with her simply being her... and every man requires the levels of being not only a knight, but also having shining armor (and the ability to provide a carriage, and any level of imagination and excitement her mind requires to maintain a state of commitment). Take that idea and mix it with modern feminine ideology then what you have is nothing more than a modern gold-digger. A modern gold-digger is weaponized. The previous used only her looks and appeal to rationalize her need for high value.

The modern uses her education, and "ideas" to rationalize her need. Neither believes in the previously mentioned traits towards attracting and maintaining a man’s happiness. While many women would disagree, this is shown in the very nature of how they act. Which is outright dominant, and masculine in today’s age. While using statements of "I will let a man lead when he shows he can lead", or simply presenting themselves only to some imaginary level of value they believe exists in the world. This is obviously all due to a wide span campaign of propaganda through media and print, it vastly increased the overall impression of what it means to be a woman, while counter-actively minimizing the majority of men… The scope of measurement and reference went to a small and unattainable percentage. They are able to do this because men have built a society so well maintained, safe, and prosperous.. that the need for what it previously meant to be man and women have shifted in favor of women. While mans needs were diminished nearly by half. Man had two things that gave him value... his purpose, and his woman. The value of his woman held more power because it was only limited to the degree of her actions towards him. She also had reasonings for these actions... safety (financial, physical, and emotional). Prior to this, there wasn't media and print over-sensationalizing the idea of WOMAN. There was a balance, and that balance helped society to prosper. Man had war, labor/career, and his woman. These things were his badges of value. After society came to a point of self autonomy, The weight of mans value shifted heavy to women, because war was unnecessary, labor was competitive, and safety and security for women were no longer an issue... a society was created that protected them from the things they sought men out for.

They say with GREAT POWER comes GREAT RESPONSIBILITY.

They definitely came into shit-load of great power. And what we see as the result of that is society and conflict between men and women we are seeing today.